![]() |
|
New
Delhi It gives me great pleasure to be
invited by Rotary Award for Service to Humanity (India) Trust to present a
very special award to a very special person this evening. Few men are perhaps better qualified
to be chosen for the first Rotary India Award on Human Rights than Justice
M. N. Venkatachaliah.
His name is indelibly linked to the noble ideal of advancement of
human rights in India, thanks to his long and distinguished service in the
judiciary and, later, as the chairman of the National Human Rights
Commission. The good
work started by him in the Commission has been continued by his able
successor, Justice Verma. Human
rights is not an alien concept to us. It is not as if India borrowed it
from democracies in the West after the issue gained international currency
in recent decades. In the
very emblem of the National Human Rights Commission is enshrined the
age-old Vedic ideal: Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah—May All Be Happy. Here
“All” does not mean all of a particular community or a race or a
nation, but all the human beings on earth.
Our ideal of human rights is, thus, as universal as it is ancient. Nor do we in India understand human rights in a limited and
restrictive sense in terms of certain abuses here and there.
It is wrong to think of human rights in parts, nor their denial in
parts. Human life and
happiness are indivisible. Only
a holistic approach will help us achieve material prosperity for all,
social and cultural progress for all, and human dignity for all. India
not only developed an original and profound understanding of human rights,
but also constructed the three pillars on which the edifice of human
rights rests. These pillars are democracy, secularism, and the rule of law.
These ideals might not have been articulated in the past through
their modern idioms. But, in their essential form, they have always been the
hallmark of the best periods in Indian history. They have been championed
by philosophers and social reformers belonging to all the diverse
religious and social traditions of India. That is why, after independence
we adopted a Constitution that guarantees basic human rights not only to
our own citizens, without any discrimination, but also to all those who
happen to visit our sacred land. I
am not harking back to the past because it is a comfortable distraction
from the glaring gap between the ideals and the reality at present.
No. I am doing
so, because I believe that we can best promote respect for human rights by
rooting our efforts in our own cultural and spiritual traditions, without,
however, turning a blind eye to the positive lessons from the experiences
of other countries around the world. I
emphasize the importance of our cultural and spiritual traditions for
another reason. Not all the right things in society can be ensured by laws
and regulations alone. Law
cannot teach a person to be compassionate, caring, and sensitive to other
people’s sorrows and joys. And
human rights cannot be secure in a society where these qualities are weak.
For example, atrocities on dalits, women, poor and the weak cannot be
stopped by legal methods alone. Social maladies call for social remedies. It
is, therefore, necessary that we pay far greater attention than we have
done so far to the role of education, media, and socio-cultural reforms in
creating an environment in which respect for human rights becomes the
natural trait of citizens and institutions. Of
course, the role of the law and governmental machinery in expanding and
deepening the scope of human rights can hardly be overemphasized. The
National Human Rights Commission has rendered a commendable service by
creating greater awareness about human rights and also by checking their
gross abuses. So far,
however, only ten states have set up similar commissions. I would urge
those States, which have not done yet so, to follow suit speedily.
Especially Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, which, I am told, account for 65
percent of the nearly fifty thousand complaints that are received annually
by the National Commission. The
Commission has suggested some amendments to the Protection of Human Rights
Act following the report of the Justice Ahmadi Committee. The Government
will examine these suggestions and take early steps to enact necessary
amendments to further strengthen the legal framework for the protection of
human rights. I
believe that we should be open and willing to fully recognize the
deficiencies and infringements in the area of human rights in India.
For without being truthful to the nature and extent of the problem,
there can be no effective and durable solution.
We should spare no effort to infuse greater sensitivity,
efficiency, and accountability in the functioning of the police,
administration and other institutions that have a direct bearing on the
human rights of citizens. Wherever
necessary, rules and procedures of these institutions should be radically
overhauled to reduce the possibility of their contributing to the
violation of human rights of our citizens. This is especially urgent in
the context of the untold difficulties faced by the poor and illiterate in
their dealings with the institutions of the State. All
the people working in these institutions should bear in mind a simple
guiding principle: The more we
enforce the rule of law, the better we promote human rights.
It is a principle, which Justice Venkatachaliah himself has
enunciated very pithily in one of his famous judgements: “Governance
is not of men but of the rule of law.”
I would like all of us responsible for governance at the Centre
and in State Governments and local bodies to mull over the meaning of
these profound words more and more. At
the same time, I wish also to caution against the tendency, seen among
some commentators on the human rights in India, to exaggerate, to
sensationalize, to judge a situation without regard to the overall
context, to view certain issues through the coloured glasses of outsiders,
and to wittingly or unwittingly project a negative picture of India around
the world. Another
thought. In a developing country like India, the task of advancing human
rights is integrally linked to speedy and balanced socio-economic growth.
Poverty is one of the worst violators of human rights—and so also is the
society that allows poverty to persist. India has all the human and
natural resources needed to provide decent living standards to all our
citizens. This, however, can be achieved only by removing the shackles on
India’s all-round economic progress. This is the true purpose of our
economic reforms. Our reforms have a human face because they are designed
to promote economic and social justice for all our citizens, especially
the poorest and the most deprived. Before
I conclude, I must applaud Justice Venkatachaliah for the new role in
which he is now serving the nation: namely, as the chairman of the
Constitution Review Commission. His stature, his erudition, and his
impeccable impartiality have been hailed by one and all. The Commission
will thoroughly review the working of our Constitution in the past five
decades of independence and make such recommendations as will, without
altering its basic structure, better serve the lofty ideals of our
Republic. Thus, in his new
responsibility, too, Justice Venkatachaliah will continue his spirited
championing of human rights. I
once again heartily congratulate Justice Venkatachaliah for receiving the
Rotary India Award on Human Rights and, thereby, further promoting the
cause of human rights in India. |