Address by Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee at the function to mark the Golden Jubilee of Republic Day, Central Hall of Parliament

New Delhi
January 27, 2000

Respected Rashtrapatiji, Upa-Rashtrapatiji, Honourable Speaker of the Lok Sabha, Distinguished Colleagues,

On January 26 India celebrated the Golden Jubilee of Republic Day. Today we have gathered here to commemorate this historic occasion. Fifty years ago, in this very hall, our Constitution was adopted.

That event was a culmination of our people’s long suppressed aspiration for freedom; of an arduous, protracted struggle for self-governance.

The journey of the creation of our Constitution has closely paralleled the journey of our Freedom Movement in the early half of the last century.

Members will recall that the `Commonwealth of India Bill’, prepared by Indians in 1924, was an important initial milestone. This was followed by the preparation of the `Swaraj Constitution’. A new dimension was added to that effort with the Fundamental Rights Declaration in 1931.

Following many ups and downs, the Non-party Conference prepared a comprehensive Constitutional scheme in 1944-45. Unfortunately, that was nipped in the bud. At last, the Constituent Assembly was set up.

Thereupon, the Constitutional Advisor to the Constituent Assembly prepared the Draft Constitution. The Draft was subjected to a clause-by-clause consideration in Committees - headed by Pandit Nehru, Sardar Patel, and other luminaries.

From the discussions in the Drafting Committee headed by Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar to the deliberations – as intense as they were intensive - in the Constituent Assembly as a whole, it was one unbroken quest for perfection.

Indeed, it was a saga. Even as they were being lashed by riots, killings, oppression and imprisonment, our leaders kept at the task decade after decade.

To read the deliberations of the constituent Assembly and its committees even today, even after 50 years, is to be overwhelmed by:

The earnestness with which they approached the task;

The insight they brought to bear on each Article;

The farsightedness with which they anticipated the situations and problems that were likely to arise;

The singular touchstone by which they judged every provisions – always guided by the interest of our country and our people;

How, engulfed as they were by the aftermath of Partition, by riots, by an invasion, by the urgent task of integrating the States – how they would abstract themselves from this tumult, gather in this very hall, and weigh, and deliberate, and fashion, and refashion, clause after clause.

We are beneficiaries of their sacrifice: we should never forget that.

We are heirs to that legacy – of exclusive, overarching devotion to the national interest; of reasoned, civil discourse; of harmonizing disparate views.

We should never forget that.

There is one great test for a Constitution, for any system of Governance. It must deliver and it must be durable.

Our Constitution has stood this test. And one reason it has been able to do so is that it embodies a masterly balance: between the rights of the individual and the requirements of collective life; between the States and the Union; between providing a robust structure and flexibility.

Our Constitution has served the needs of both India’s diversity and her innate unity. It has strengthened India’s democratic traditions.

But even in the mightiest fort one has to repair the parapet from time to time, one has to clean the moat and check the banisters. The same is true about our Constitution.

Five decades after the adoption of the Constitution, India is faced with a new situation. The need for stability, both at the Centre and in the States, has been felt acutely.

The people are impatient for faster socio-economic development. The country is also faced with a pressing challenge to quickly remove regional and social imbalances by reorienting the development process to benefit the poorest and the weakest.

That is the purpose for which a Commission to review the Constitution is proposed to be set up. The basic structure and the core ideals of our Constitution, however, will remain inviolate.

Let us not forget that in the end a Constitution is only as good as the ones who work the institutions which it has set up.

Participating in the Constituent Assembly debates, Dr.Ambedkar had said:

"I feel, however good a Constitution may be, it is sure to turn out bad because those who are called to work it, happen to be a bad lot. However bad a Constitution may be, it may turn out to be good if those who are called to work it, happen to be a good lot. The Constitution can provide only the organs of State such as the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary. The factors on which the working of those organs of the State depend are the people and the political parties they will set up as their instruments to carry out their wishes and their politics".

There is widespread apprehension today that our institutions are not working as the Constitution intends, that the conduct of those of us who run them is not what the proper functioning of those institutions requires.

Let this be our resolve today:

  • We shall leave institutions – above all, our Parliament and our State Legislatures – for the coming generation in a condition vastly better than the condition in which we found them;
  • In discharging our duties in them, our conduct will be such as would have done the Founding Fathers proud.

That would be a fitting way to repay our debt to them. That would be the one tribute worthy of them.