March 07, 2004
The
Secret of Our Sauce By THOMAS L.
FRIEDMAN BANGALORE,
India Yamini Narayanan is an
Indian-born 35-year-old with a Ph.D. in economics from the University of
Oklahoma. After graduation, she worked for a U.S. computer company in
Virginia and recently moved back to Bangalore with her husband to be closer
to family. When I asked her how she felt about the outsourcing of jobs from
her adopted country, America, to her native country, India, she responded
with a revealing story: "I just read about a guy
in America who lost his job to India and he made a T-shirt that said, `I
lost my job to India and all I got was this [lousy] T-shirt.' And he made
all kinds of money." Only in America, she said, shaking her head, would
someone figure out how to profit from his own unemployment. And that, she
insisted, was the reason America need not fear outsourcing to India: America
is so much more innovative a place than any other country. There is a reason the
"next big thing" almost always comes out of America, said Mrs.
Narayanan. When she and her husband came back to live in Bangalore and
enrolled their son in a good private school, he found himself totally
stifled because of the emphasis on rote learning — rather than the
independent thinking he was exposed to in his U.S. school. They had to take
him out and look for another, more avant-garde private school. "America
allows you to explore your mind," she said. The whole concept of
outsourcing was actually invented in America, added her husband, Sean,
because no one else figured it out. The Narayanans are worth
listening to at this time of rising insecurity over white-collar job losses
to India. America is the greatest engine of innovation that has ever
existed, and it can't be duplicated anytime soon, because it is the product
of a multitude of factors: extreme freedom of thought, an emphasis on
independent thinking, a steady immigration of new minds, a risk-taking
culture with no stigma attached to trying and failing, a noncorrupt
bureaucracy, and financial markets and a venture capital system that are
unrivaled at taking new ideas and turning them into global products. "You have this whole
ecosystem [that constitutes] a unique crucible for innovation," said
Nandan Nilekani, the C.E.O. of Infosys, India's I.B.M. "I was in Europe
the other day and they were commiserating about the 400,000 [European]
knowledge workers who have gone to live in the U.S. because of the
innovative environment there. The whole process where people get an idea and
put together a team, raise the capital, create a product and mainstream it
— that can only be done in the U.S. It can't be done sitting in India. The
Indian part of the equation [is to help] these innovative [U.S.] companies
bring their products to the market quicker, cheaper and better, which
increases the innovative cycle there. It is a complimentarity we need to
enhance." That is so right. As Robert
Hof, a tech writer for Business Week, noted, U.S. tech workers "must
keep creating leading edge technologies that make their companies more
productive — especially innovations that spark entirely new markets."
The same tech innovations that produced outsourcing, he noted, also produced
eBay, Amazon.com, Google and thousands of new jobs along with them. This is America's real edge.
Sure Bangalore has a lot of engineering schools, but the local government is
rife with corruption; half the city has no sidewalks; there are constant
electricity blackouts; the rivers are choked with pollution; the public
school system is dysfunctional; beggars dart in and out of the traffic,
which is in constant gridlock; and the whole infrastructure is falling
apart. The big high-tech firms here reside on beautiful, walled campuses,
because they maintain their own water, electricity and communications
systems. They thrive by defying their political-economic environment, not by
emerging from it. What would Indian techies
give for just one day of America's rule of law; its dependable, regulated
financial markets; its efficient, noncorrupt bureaucracy; and its best
public schools and universities? They'd give a lot. These institutions, which
nurture innovation, are our real crown jewels that must be protected — not
the 1 percent of jobs that might be outsourced. But it is precisely these
crown jewels that can be squandered if we become lazy, or engage in mindless
protectionism, or persist in radical tax cutting that can only erode the
strength and quality of our government and educational institutions. Our competitors know the
secret of our sauce. But do we? |